Claremont Freehold Property Snapshot
Residential Market Audit — Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 Comparative Performance
Strict Data Audit Methodology: Only clean, market-related freehold residential house transfers are included in these calculations. To prevent statistical distortion, we have isolated each enclave and strictly excluded Sectional Title registers, non-market transfers (e.g. ESTATE, VESTING, or DONATION), and multi-property registrations. We have also strictly excluded vacant land sales (such as Greenways Estate erfs) to protect pure house-to-house appreciation modeling.
Sales Volume
0 Q1 2025: 24 ▼ -29.2%
Scarcity indicator (Supply contraction)
Scarcity indicator (Supply contraction)
Gross Transactional Spend
0 Q1 2025: R 160,220,000 ▼ -9.0%
Gross enclave liquidity registered in Q1
Gross enclave liquidity registered in Q1
Average Sale Price
0 Q1 2025: R 6,675,833 ▲ +28.5%
Mean transactional value growth
Mean transactional value growth
Median Sale Price
0 Q1 2025: R 6,870,000 ▲ +31.0%
Enclave midpoint value shift
Enclave midpoint value shift
Average Rate per m²
0 Q1 2025: R 10,334 /m² ▲ +30.7%
Primary Enclave Strength Index
Primary Enclave Strength Index
Average Property Extent
0 Q1 2025: 646 m² ▼ -1.7%
Mean physical land stand size sold
Mean physical land stand size sold
📄 View Audited Q1 2026 Registered Freehold Sales List (Claremont Upper)
| Street Address | Property Type | Stand Extent | Registered Price | Rands per m² |
|---|
Statistical Property Modeling & Adjustments
Freehold value tracking uses mathematical formulations to separate physical structural changes from spatial extent changes. Let the absolute transaction value of a property be $P$, and its physical land extent be $A$. The unit rate of capital density $R$ is formulated as:
R = \frac{P}{A}
To compute the pure rate of capital appreciation ($g$) between Q1 2025 ($t_1$) and Q1 2026 ($t_2$), we calculate the geometric percentage growth of the average capital density ($\bar{R}$), representing our Primary Strength Indicator:
g = \left( \frac{\bar{R}_{t_2} – \bar{R}_{t_1}}{\bar{R}_{t_1}} \right) \times 100\%
Note: This analysis demonstrates that when absolute prices trend downwards slightly due to size differences (as observed in Claremont Village), the unit capital rate $R$ reveals true structural capital growth.
Claremont Upper – Market Analytical Commentary